Health and Insurance Information

Low-Carbohydrate Vs. Low-Fat Diets For Weight Loss: Novel Evidence

A novel high-profile study compared the weight loss in addition to cardiovascular effects of a low-carbohydrate diet vs. a low-fat diet.  Although many studies have got done this before, this 1 is novel plenty to add together to our electrical flow agreement of diet in addition to health.  Unlike most other studies of this nature, diet adherence was fairly good, in addition to refined saccharify restriction produced greater weight loss in addition to cardiovascular conduct chances constituent improvements than fatty restriction at the one-year mark.  Yet similar previous studies, neither diet produced real impressive results.

The Study

Lydia A. Bazzano in addition to colleagues at Tulane University randomly assigned 148 obese men in addition to women without cardiovascular affliction into 2 groups (1):
  1. Received instructions to consume less than twoscore grams of refined saccharify per day, addition 1 low-carbohydrate repast replacement per day.  No specific advice to alter calorie intake.  Met regularly alongside dietitians to explicate the dietary changes in addition to hold motivation.
  2. Received instructions to consume less than xxx percent of calories from fat, less than vii percent of calories equally saturated fat, in addition to 55 percent of calories from carbohydrate, addition 1 low-fat repast replacement per day.  No specific advice to alter calorie intake.  This is based on NCEP guidelines, which are genuinely designed for cardiovascular conduct chances reduction in addition to non weight loss.  Met regularly alongside dietitians to explicate the dietary changes in addition to hold motivation.
Participants were followed upwardly for 1 year, alongside information reported for three month, vi month, in addition to 12 calendar month timepoints.  This study genuinely measured trunk fatty percentage, simply unfortunately did then using bioelectrical impedance (like on roughly bath scales), which is essentially meaningless inward this context.


About xx percent of people inward each grouping dropped out earlier the destination of the study.  Over the course of didactics of a year, they followed their respective diets good plenty to brand the study informative.

The low-carbohydrate grouping didn't attain the target of less than twoscore grams of refined saccharify a day, withal participants did cut back refined saccharify intake substantially, from 242 g at baseline to 97, 93, in addition to 127 g at 3, 6, in addition to 12 months, respectively.  Even at the 12-month timepoint, this grouping was alone eating almost one-half its initial refined saccharify intake.  This is a low-carb diet whatever agency y'all acre it, although non "very depression carb" or especially ketogenic.  This relatively high flat of diet adherence sets this study apart from most other low-carb studies.

The low-fat diet grouping reduced fatty intake from 81 g per hateful solar daytime at baseline to 45, 46 in addition to 52 g per hateful solar daytime at 3, 6, in addition to 12 months, respectively.  This qualifies equally a moderately low-fat diet, although non "very depression fat".

What happened to trunk weight in addition to fatness?  At 1 year, trunk weight was downwards past times 12 lbs (5.3 kg) inward the low-carb grouping in addition to iv lbs (1.8 kg) inward the low-fat group, alongside the divergence beingness statistically significant.  This is notable because most studies present no divergence inward weight loss betwixt these 2 diets at 1-2 twelvemonth timepoints.  This could hold upwardly because the low-fat diet grouping didn't have calorie advice, because the low-fat diet wasn't specifically designed for weight loss, and/or because diet adherence was fairly proficient inward the LC group.  It's also notable that both groups maintained their weight loss fairly good over time, which also isn't typical.  This is belike because the daily repast replacement that was provided facilitated a higher flat of diet adherence over time.

Waist circumference decreased past times almost the same total inward both groups, indicating similar reductions inward harmful abdominal fat.  The alter inward trunk composition they reported was tiny, simply 1 time to a greater extent than the method they used to mensurate it is unreliable.

Improvements inward cardiovascular conduct chances factors were greater inward the low-carb group.  Total cholesterol in addition to LDL ("bad") cholesterol remained the same inward both groups, despite substantial differences inward saturated fatty intake.  HDL ("good") cholesterol increased inward the low-carb group, in addition to the ratio of total:HDL cholesterol consequently improved.  C-reactive protein, an inflammatory conduct chances factor, was lower on the low-carb diet.  The Framingham Risk Score, a mensurate used to approximate the overall conduct chances of having a midpoint assault over the adjacent 10 years, improved on the low-carb diet in addition to didn't alter on the low-fat diet.  The FRS is based on age, full cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, smoking status, in addition to blood pressure.

Interestingly, at that spot were no differences inward fasting glucose or insulin betwixt groups, in addition to if anything at that spot was a tendency for both to hold upwardly lower inward the low-fat group.


The low-fat diet had modest beneficial effects on weight in addition to health.  The low-carb diet caused greater weight loss that was fairly good sustained over a one-year follow-up, withal the flat of weight loss was modest, amounting to a 5.5 percent reduction inward trunk weight.  This is of import because the low-carb diet grouping reduced refined saccharify intake past times 48-60 percent in addition to sustained it for a year.  

The low-carb diet did amend estimated cardiovascular conduct chances somewhat, simply the lawsuit was modest.  


The low-carb vs. low-fat weight loss debate is getting somewhat stale, simply this study was novel plenty to warrant a post.  This study is 1 of the minority of trials that demonstrated a long-term (1-2 year) weight loss wages for a low-carb diet over a low-fat diet, withal it's consistent alongside all previous studies suggesting that neither approach is real effective for fatty loss inward the long term.  Both diet groups went from obese to slightly less obese.

I persuasion the low-carbohydrate diet equally a tool inward the fatty loss toolbox, simply 1 that's most effective equally business office of a broader overall fatty loss strategy.  In the Ideal Weight Program, both of our fatty loss diets are lower inward refined saccharify in addition to high inward protein.  Our approach is to contain multiple diet in addition to lifestyle factors that have got been shown to conduct on nutrient intake in addition to trunk weight, rather than limiting ourselves to a single-factor intervention.

However, this study does have got a substantial argent lining.  Both diet groups, simply especially the low-carb group, were able to sustain their weight loss over a one-year period.  This is inward contrast to most other diet studies.  I've ever wondered how much of this find is due to decreasing diet adherence over time, in addition to how much is due to physiological in addition to behavioral adaptation to the diets.  Adherence was pretty proficient inward this study, belike due to the fact that the investigators provided daily repast replacements.  This argues that weight find over fourth dimension may have got to a greater extent than to attain alongside relaxed adherence than to adaptation, which is proficient news.

This study also adds to the evidence that low-fat high-carbohydrate diets tin movement weight loss.  Even though the flat of weight loss is real modest, in addition to perhaps non important from a clinical standpoint, this farther undermines the declaration that the carbohydrate-centric USDA dietary recommendations caused the obesity epidemic.  It turns out, when y'all position people on a diet that's similar to the USDA guidelines, they don't mostly gain weight, in addition to they oftentimes lose a petty bit.

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 telephone commutation unanswered inquiry is whether low-carbohydrate diets are compatible alongside cardiovascular health.  This study adds to the evidence suggesting that they are, although nosotros soundless remove long-term studies alongside difficult cardiovascular outcomes to hold upwardly certain.

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 telephone commutation virtue of low-carbohydrate in addition to low-fat diets is that they're slow for people to understand.  "Carbs/fats are bad; avoid them" is a unproblematic heuristic that's easily internalized in addition to position into practice.  This advice tin Pb to weight loss in addition to apparent improvements inward cardiovascular health, in addition to inward roughly individuals it tin hold upwardly quite effective, simply it's non a argent bullet.



Post a Comment